Richard Randall on Crime

Opposes death penalty because guilt is never unequivocal

Q: Your views on death penalty?

A: Libertarians believe in compensation of the victim, not punishment. However, a murderer might be put to death if that was the compensation that the family wanted most. Because of the finality of this compensation, guilt would most likely need to be unequivocal. The ability to determine guilt with DNA testing has indicated that a number of innocent people have been executed in the past. Some libertarians point to these mistakes as a reason not to give the State authority to execute.

The Libertarian Party takes no formal stand on capital punishment and libertarians differ in their attitude towards it. My personal belief is that a libertarian society should outlaw capital "compensation" AT THIS TIME because of the difficulty in determining unequivocal guilt. If at some time in the future it becomes possible to prove unequivocal guilt, then I may support capital "compensation".

Source: E-mail exchange with OnTheIssues.org Oct 17, 2004

Mandatory minimums violate sentencing proportional to crime

Q: Your views on Three Strikes laws?

A: Rather than protecting innocent people from violent criminals, the 'Three Strikes' laws have instead resulted in more individuals receiving egregious mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent, victimless crimes. When someone is being locked up for the rest of their life because they had some marijuana in their possession, something is very wrong.

Libertarians support the concept that law should impose penalties proportional to the gravity of the violation of others' rights. Therefore, I oppose the "Three- Strikes-and-You're-Out" laws because they fail to focus on the truly violent career criminals who are the greatest threat to their victims.

Source: E-mail exchange with OnTheIssues.org Oct 17, 2004

Base justice on restitution instead of punishment

Source: Campaign website, www.lpcocandidates.org/randall/, "Issues" Oct 14, 2004

  • Click here for definitions & background information on Crime.
  • Click here for policy papers on Crime.
  • Click here for SenateMatch answers by Richard Randall.
  • Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Crime in The Forum.
Other candidates on Crime: Richard Randall on other issues:
CO Gubernatorial:
Bill Owens
CO Senatorial:
Ben Nighthorse Campbell
Bob Schaffer
Hank Brown
Ken Salazar
Mike Miles
Pete Coors
Raul Acosta
Tom Strickland
Wayne Allard

George W. Bush
(Republican for President)
V.P.Dick Cheney
(Republican for V.P.)
Sen.John Kerry
(Democratic nominee for Pres.)
Sen.John Edwards
(Democratic nominee for V.P.)
Ralph Nader
(Reform nominee for Pres.)
Peter Camejo
(Reform nominee for V.P.)
David Cobb
(Green nominee for Pres.)
Michael Badnarik
(Libertarian nominee for Pres.)
Michael Peroutka
(Constitution nominee for Pres.)
2004 Senate Races:
(AK)Knowles v.Murkowski v.Sykes
(AR)Holt v.Lincoln
(AZ)McCain v.Starky
(CA)Boxer v.Jones v.Gray
(CO)Coors v.Salazar v.Randall v.Acosta
(CT)Dodd v.Orchulli
(FL)Castor v.Martinez
(GA)Isakson v.Majette v.Buckley
(IA)Grassley v.Small v.Northrop
(IL)Obama v.Keyes
(IN)Bayh v.Scott
(KY)Bunning v.Mongiardo
(LA)John v.Vitter
(MD)Mikulski v.Pipkin
(MO)Bond v.Farmer
(NC)Bowles v.Burr
(ND)Dorgan v.Liffrig
(NH)Granny D v.Gregg
(NV)Reid v.Ziser
(NY)Schumer v.Mills v.McReynolds
(OH)Fingerhut v.Voinovich
(OK)Carson v.Coburn
(OR)Wyden v.King
(PA)Hoeffel v.Specter
(SC)DeMint v.Tenenbaum
(SD)Daschle v.Thune
(UT)Bennett v.Van Dam
(VT)Leahy v.McMullen
(WA)Murray v.Nethercutt
(WI)Feingold v.Michels
Civil Rights
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Social Security
Tax Reform

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes
Search for...